The marriage
According to the plaintiff's filings, Diallo stated in her deposition that she was not married (deposition p. 7, lines 14–15). Those same filings cite a Harris County, Texas, marriage record that they say contradicts that statement. The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment lists this alongside the other episodes on this site.
The dating-site spending
The plaintiff's filings also cite bank records showing what they describe as considerable spending on subscriptions to multiple dating websites during the period covered by the complaint.
The deposition
Diallo sat for a deposition in the case that, according to the plaintiff's motion, lasted less than three hours. Across that deposition, the plaintiff's own count — presented in his motion for summary judgment — found that she answered "I don't recall" 52 times and "I don't remember" 59 times, a total of 111 variations of the same response.
The plaintiff's filings also state that, in the same deposition, Diallo admitted she had never sold any iron ore and that no sales contract for it existed — the one direct admission in the record that touches the mining scheme described in The Fake Mining Business.
What the record shows
The deposition count and the marriage-record citation come from the plaintiff's own filings; the underlying deposition transcript itself was submitted to the court as an exhibit but is not independently summarized here beyond what the plaintiff's motion represents it to say. As with the rest of this site, this material was entered as uncontested in the judgment rather than tested through cross-examination at trial — see the main article for that history.